Andersen vs Møller Wolfe

FPL Comparison · this week · Who to buy?

Quick answer: Buy Møller Wolfe over Andersen this week. Møller Wolfe edges it on: stronger captain verdict (AVOID).

Buy Møller Wolfe over Andersen this week.

Møller Wolfe edges it on: stronger captain verdict (AVOID).

Andersen
Fulham
DEF£4.4m2.8% owned
0
Goals
1
Assists
123
Points
Engine verdict:UNAVAILABLE
Suspended until 29 Aug
Full profile →
✓ Recommended pick
DEF£4.2m0.1% owned
0
Goals
2
Assists
35
Points
Engine verdict:AVOID
Full profile →

Head-to-Head Stats

Andersen (A) vs Møller Wolfe (B) — ✓ marks the better value
AStatB
£4.4mPrice£4.2m
2.8%Ownership0.1%
123Total points35
0Goals0
1Assists2
8Clean sheets1
8Bonus points0
0.0Form (last 30 days)0.0
2.4Avg pts last 5 GWs1.2
Next fixture xP
6-GW projected xP
1.4xG this season0.1
1.8xA this season1.1

Recent Form — Last 5 Gameweeks

Andersen
11
3
-2
0
0
Møller Wolfe
1
0
1
2
2

Upcoming Fixture Difficulty

Andersen
No upcoming fixtures
Møller Wolfe
No upcoming fixtures
Easy (D1–2) Medium (D3) Hard (D4) Very hard (D5)

Andersen vs Møller Wolfe — Common Questions

Should I buy Andersen or Møller Wolfe in FPL?

Buy Møller Wolfe over Andersen this week. Møller Wolfe edges it on: stronger captain verdict (AVOID). Andersen costs £4.4m and Møller Wolfe costs £4.2m — the price gap is £0.2m.

Andersen or Møller Wolfe — who should I captain this gameweek?

Onside recommends Møller Wolfe as the captain pick for this gameweek (AVOID). Møller Wolfe edges it on: stronger captain verdict (AVOID).

How do Andersen and Møller Wolfe compare statistically?

This season: Andersen has 0 goals + 1 assists (123 pts, £4.4m). Møller Wolfe has 0 goals + 2 assists (35 pts, £4.2m). Møller Wolfe lead on goal involvements.

Do Andersen or Møller Wolfe take set pieces?

Neither Andersen nor Møller Wolfe are listed as primary set-piece takers in Onside's current data.

Explore More

Comparison data sourced from Fantasy Premier League API. Verdicts computed by the Onside v5 engine with Monte Carlo simulation. Refreshes every hour via ISR.