Šeško vs Wright

FPL Comparison · GW1 · Who to buy?

Quick answer: Buy Wright over Šeško this week. Wright edges it on: higher projected xP (1.8).

Buy Wright over Šeško this week.

Wright edges it on: higher projected xP (1.8).

Šeško
Man Utd
FWD£7.0m3.2% owned
11
Goals
2
Assists
111
Points
Engine verdict:AVOID
Next: @ HUL · D2/5 · 1.7 xP
Shin injury - 75% chance of playing
Full profile →
✓ Recommended pick
Wright
Coventry City
FWD£5.5m1.9% owned
0
Goals
0
Assists
0
Points
Engine verdict:AVOID
Next: @ ARS · D5/5 · 1.8 xP
Full profile →

Head-to-Head Stats

Šeško (A) vs Wright (B) — ✓ marks the better value
AStatB
£7.0mPrice£5.5m
3.2%Ownership1.9%
111Total points0
11Goals0
2Assists0
19Bonus points0
0.0Form (last 30 days)0.0
0.0Avg pts last 5 GWs0.0
1.7Next fixture xP1.8
10.26-GW projected xP11.2
9.2xG this season0.0
0.3xA this season0.0

Recent Form — Last 5 Gameweeks

Šeško
No history
Wright
No history

Upcoming Fixture Difficulty

Šeško
HUL
IPS
EVE
MCI
FUL
TOT
Wright
ARS
HUL
MCI
BHA
NFO
NEW
Easy (D1–2) Medium (D3) Hard (D4) Very hard (D5)

Šeško vs Wright — Common Questions

Should I buy Šeško or Wright in FPL?

Buy Wright over Šeško this week. Wright edges it on: higher projected xP (1.8). Šeško costs £7.0m and Wright costs £5.5m — the price gap is £1.5m.

Šeško or Wright — who should I captain GW1?

Onside recommends Wright as the captain pick for GW1 (AVOID). Wright edges it on: higher projected xP (1.8).

How do Šeško and Wright compare statistically?

This season: Šeško has 11 goals + 2 assists (111 pts, £7.0m). Wright has 0 goals + 0 assists (0 pts, £5.5m). Šeško lead on goal involvements.

Who has the better fixture — Šeško or Wright?

GW1: Šeško plays @ HUL (D2) and Wright plays @ ARS (D5). Šeško has the easier fixture.

Do Šeško or Wright take set pieces?

Neither Šeško nor Wright are listed as primary set-piece takers in Onside's current data.

Explore More

Compare Šeško against:

Comparison data sourced from Fantasy Premier League API. Verdicts computed by the Onside engine. Data refreshes continuously.