Tavernier vs Cook

FPL Comparison · GW1 · Who to buy?

Quick answer: Buy Tavernier over Cook this week. Tavernier edges it on: higher projected xP (2.1).

Buy Tavernier over Cook this week.

Tavernier edges it on: higher projected xP (2.1).

✓ Recommended pick
Tavernier
Bournemouth
MID£6.0m1.5% owned
0
Goals
0
Assists
0
Points
Engine verdict:AVOID
Next: @ MCI · D5/5 · 2.1 xP
Full profile →
Cook
Bournemouth
MID£5.0m0.2% owned
0
Goals
0
Assists
0
Points
Engine verdict:AVOID
Next: @ MCI · D5/5 · 1.5 xP
Full profile →

Head-to-Head Stats

Tavernier (A) vs Cook (B) — ✓ marks the better value
AStatB
£6.0mPrice£5.0m
1.5%Ownership0.2%
0Total points0
0Goals0
0Assists0
0Bonus points0
0.0Form (last 30 days)0.0
0.0Avg pts last 5 GWs0.0
2.1Next fixture xP1.5
12.06-GW projected xP8.6
0.0xG this season0.0
0.0xA this season0.0

Recent Form — Last 5 Gameweeks

Tavernier
0
Cook
0

Upcoming Fixture Difficulty

Tavernier
MCI
EVE
NEW
BRE
LIV
CHE
Cook
MCI
EVE
NEW
BRE
LIV
CHE
Easy (D1–2) Medium (D3) Hard (D4) Very hard (D5)

Tavernier vs Cook — Common Questions

Should I buy Tavernier or Cook in FPL?

Buy Tavernier over Cook this week. Tavernier edges it on: higher projected xP (2.1). Tavernier costs £6.0m and Cook costs £5.0m — the price gap is £1.0m.

Tavernier or Cook — who should I captain GW1?

Onside recommends Tavernier as the captain pick for GW1 (AVOID). Tavernier edges it on: higher projected xP (2.1).

How do Tavernier and Cook compare statistically?

This season: Tavernier has 0 goals + 0 assists (0 pts, £6.0m). Cook has 0 goals + 0 assists (0 pts, £5.0m). Both players lead equally on goal involvements.

Who has the better fixture — Tavernier or Cook?

GW1: Tavernier plays @ MCI (D5) and Cook plays @ MCI (D5). Both have the same fixture difficulty.

Do Tavernier or Cook take set pieces?

Tavernier takes penalties and free kicks and corners for Bournemouth. Cook does not take set pieces.

Explore More

Compare Tavernier against:

Comparison data sourced from Fantasy Premier League API. Verdicts computed by the Onside engine. Data refreshes continuously.