Virgil vs J.Timber

FPL Comparison · this week · Who to buy?

Quick answer: Buy Virgil over J.Timber this week. Virgil scores higher across the engine's combined signals.

Buy Virgil over J.Timber this week.

Virgil scores higher across the engine's combined signals.

✓ Recommended pick
Virgil
Liverpool
DEF£6.1m31.5% owned
6
Goals
1
Assists
175
Points
Engine verdict:AVOID
Full profile →
J.Timber
Arsenal
DEF£6.0m15.2% owned
3
Goals
6
Assists
149
Points
Engine verdict:AVOID
Lack of match fitness - 25% chance of playing
Full profile →

Head-to-Head Stats

Virgil (A) vs J.Timber (B) — ✓ marks the better value
AStatB
£6.1mPrice£6.0m
31.5%Ownership15.2%
175Total points149
6Goals3
1Assists6
10Clean sheets13
10Bonus points9
0.0Form (last 30 days)0.0
4.6Avg pts last 5 GWs0.0
Next fixture xP
6-GW projected xP
3.8xG this season4.7
1.4xA this season1.5

Recent Form — Last 5 Gameweeks

Virgil
4
1
2
14
2
J.Timber
0
0
0
0
0

Upcoming Fixture Difficulty

Virgil
No upcoming fixtures
J.Timber
No upcoming fixtures
Easy (D1–2) Medium (D3) Hard (D4) Very hard (D5)

Virgil vs J.Timber — Common Questions

Should I buy Virgil or J.Timber in FPL?

Buy Virgil over J.Timber this week. Virgil scores higher across the engine's combined signals. Virgil costs £6.1m and J.Timber costs £6.0m — the price gap is £0.1m.

Virgil or J.Timber — who should I captain this gameweek?

Onside recommends Virgil as the captain pick for this gameweek (AVOID). Virgil scores higher across the engine's combined signals.

How do Virgil and J.Timber compare statistically?

This season: Virgil has 6 goals + 1 assists (175 pts, £6.1m). J.Timber has 3 goals + 6 assists (149 pts, £6.0m). J.Timber lead on goal involvements.

Do Virgil or J.Timber take set pieces?

Neither Virgil nor J.Timber are listed as primary set-piece takers in Onside's current data.

Explore More

Comparison data sourced from Fantasy Premier League API. Verdicts computed by the Onside v5 engine with Monte Carlo simulation. Refreshes every hour via ISR.

Virgil vs J.Timber FPL 2026-27 — Who to Buy? | Onside · Onside