J.Timber vs Van Hecke

FPL Comparison · this week · Who to buy?

Quick answer: Buy Van Hecke over J.Timber this week. Van Hecke scores higher across the engine's combined signals.

Buy Van Hecke over J.Timber this week.

Van Hecke scores higher across the engine's combined signals.

J.Timber
Arsenal
DEF£6.0m15.2% owned
3
Goals
6
Assists
149
Points
Engine verdict:AVOID
Lack of match fitness - 25% chance of playing
Full profile →
✓ Recommended pick
Van Hecke
Brighton
DEF£4.7m10.7% owned
3
Goals
3
Assists
148
Points
Engine verdict:AVOID
Full profile →

Head-to-Head Stats

J.Timber (A) vs Van Hecke (B) — ✓ marks the better value
AStatB
£6.0mPrice£4.7m
15.2%Ownership10.7%
149Total points148
3Goals3
6Assists3
13Clean sheets10
9Bonus points8
0.0Form (last 30 days)0.0
0.0Avg pts last 5 GWs3.4
Next fixture xP
6-GW projected xP
4.7xG this season3.3
1.5xA this season1.6

Recent Form — Last 5 Gameweeks

J.Timber
0
0
0
0
0
Van Hecke
6
2
6
2
1

Upcoming Fixture Difficulty

J.Timber
No upcoming fixtures
Van Hecke
No upcoming fixtures
Easy (D1–2) Medium (D3) Hard (D4) Very hard (D5)

J.Timber vs Van Hecke — Common Questions

Should I buy J.Timber or Van Hecke in FPL?

Buy Van Hecke over J.Timber this week. Van Hecke scores higher across the engine's combined signals. J.Timber costs £6.0m and Van Hecke costs £4.7m — the price gap is £1.3m.

J.Timber or Van Hecke — who should I captain this gameweek?

Onside recommends Van Hecke as the captain pick for this gameweek (AVOID). Van Hecke scores higher across the engine's combined signals.

How do J.Timber and Van Hecke compare statistically?

This season: J.Timber has 3 goals + 6 assists (149 pts, £6.0m). Van Hecke has 3 goals + 3 assists (148 pts, £4.7m). J.Timber lead on goal involvements.

Do J.Timber or Van Hecke take set pieces?

Neither J.Timber nor Van Hecke are listed as primary set-piece takers in Onside's current data.

Explore More

Comparison data sourced from Fantasy Premier League API. Verdicts computed by the Onside v5 engine with Monte Carlo simulation. Refreshes every hour via ISR.