Okafor vs Stach

FPL Comparison · GW7 · Who to buy?

✅

Buy Stach over Okafor this week.

Stach edges it on: higher projected xP (3.5), better recent form (3.5).

Decided on Stach? Finish the job:

Okafor
Leeds
MID£5.8m0.4% owned
1
Goals
0
Assists
20
Points
Captain verdict:DIFFERENTIAL
Next: vs MUN · D4/5 · 2.5 xP
Full profile →
✓ Recommended pick
Stach
Leeds
MID£6.0m2.3% owned
1
Goals
0
Assists
29
Points
Captain verdict:DIFFERENTIAL
Next: vs MUN · D4/5 · 3.5 xP
Full profile →

Head-to-Head Stats

Okafor (A) vs Stach (B) — ✓ marks the better value
AStatB
£5.8m✓Price£6.0m
0.4%Ownership2.3%
20Total points✓29
1Goals1
0Assists0
1Bonus points✓3
2.5Form (last 30 days)✓3.5
3.8✓Avg pts last 5 GWs3.2
2.5Next fixture xP✓3.5
15.46-GW projected xP✓21.5
0.2xG this season✓1.1
0.3xA this season✓0.4

Recent Form — Last 5 Gameweeks

Okafor
2
3
9
3
2
Stach
4
2
3
5
2

Upcoming Fixture Difficulty

Okafor
MUN
SUN
BOU
TOT
CHE
COV
Stach
MUN
SUN
BOU
TOT
CHE
COV
Easy (D1–2) Medium (D3) Hard (D4) Very hard (D5)

Okafor vs Stach — Common Questions

Should I buy Okafor or Stach in FPL?

Buy Stach over Okafor this week. Stach edges it on: higher projected xP (3.5), better recent form (3.5). Okafor costs £5.8m and Stach costs £6.0m — the price gap is £0.2m.

Okafor or Stach — who should I captain GW7?

Onside recommends Stach as the captain pick for GW7. Stach edges it on: higher projected xP (3.5), better recent form (3.5).

How do Okafor and Stach compare statistically?

This season: Okafor has 1 goals + 0 assists (20 pts, £5.8m). Stach has 1 goals + 0 assists (29 pts, £6.0m). Both players lead equally on goal involvements.

Who has the better fixture — Okafor or Stach?

GW7: Okafor plays vs MUN (D4) and Stach plays vs MUN (D4). Both have the same fixture difficulty.

Do Okafor or Stach take set pieces?

Okafor does not take set pieces. Stach takes free kicks and corners for Leeds.

Explore More

Compare Okafor against:

Comparison data sourced from Fantasy Premier League API. Verdicts computed by the Onside engine. Data refreshes continuously.